Comments on: Alternative Energy Without the Hippies http://www.nextgengop.com/2009/04/10/alternative-energy-without-the-hippies/ Political Commentary and Analysis from the GOP's Future Leaders and Visionaries Mon, 24 Oct 2011 08:04:48 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 By: Macnet http://www.nextgengop.com/2009/04/10/alternative-energy-without-the-hippies/comment-page-1/#comment-13728 Macnet Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:22:35 +0000 http://www.nextgengop.com/?p=1427#comment-13728 We should concentrate more on Alternative Energy sources like hydrogen and solar because fossil fuels are already depleted and they are polluting the environment. We should concentrate more on Alternative Energy sources like hydrogen and solar because fossil fuels are already depleted and they are polluting the environment.

]]> By: Roger Alternez http://www.nextgengop.com/2009/04/10/alternative-energy-without-the-hippies/comment-page-1/#comment-3243 Roger Alternez Mon, 13 Apr 2009 01:54:56 +0000 http://www.nextgengop.com/?p=1427#comment-3243 Nuclear Energy is safe. France uses almost entirely nuclear energy and hasn't had any major problems. And what many liberals seem to forget about nuclear energy is, it leads to nuclear fusion. Fusion is the real future energy source we should be investing in. If we had fusion reactors, our energy supply and problems would be overhauled. We'd have endless limitless energy. But if Obama is going to keep listening to hippies and eco-freaks who think anything that isn't magical pixie dust and water is bad for the environment, this won't happen during his term. I don't expect it to happen for a long time yet, but if we had the right kind of president we could be on our way to that future. Nuclear energy as it is could keep us independent of the Saudi's and terrorist funding nations. Unfortunately, it seems the eco-freaks WANT cleaner energy, but turn their noses up at the few sources we could use to achieve it. It's because the green movement isn't about helping people, it's about forcing people to live below their means, forcing people to live in a hellish environment just to save the environment with stupid and unproven ways of doing so. It's taking socialism and putting a pretty green bow on it. Nuclear Energy is safe. France uses almost entirely nuclear energy and hasn’t had any major problems. And what many liberals seem to forget about nuclear energy is, it leads to nuclear fusion. Fusion is the real future energy source we should be investing in. If we had fusion reactors, our energy supply and problems would be overhauled. We’d have endless limitless energy.

But if Obama is going to keep listening to hippies and eco-freaks who think anything that isn’t magical pixie dust and water is bad for the environment, this won’t happen during his term. I don’t expect it to happen for a long time yet, but if we had the right kind of president we could be on our way to that future. Nuclear energy as it is could keep us independent of the Saudi’s and terrorist funding nations.

Unfortunately, it seems the eco-freaks WANT cleaner energy, but turn their noses up at the few sources we could use to achieve it. It’s because the green movement isn’t about helping people, it’s about forcing people to live below their means, forcing people to live in a hellish environment just to save the environment with stupid and unproven ways of doing so. It’s taking socialism and putting a pretty green bow on it.

]]>