Since their devastating defeat on November 4, Republicans have been working to rebuild and turn the tide of the past two cycles. They took major steps in doing so, including replacing RNC Chairman Mike Duncan with Michael Steele and becoming involved with national organizations such as that focus on a complete reformation of the Republican Party. There are many major goals that Republicans must accomplish in order to truly get back on the right track. Here is a look at a few of these goals and the progress the GOP has made thus far in accomplishing them.
Building an an effective grassroots network that can quickly be mobilized, represents a vast array of constituencies, and is of the national scale of Obama’s campaign network.
It has already been clearly established that Obama’s use of his campaign network to is proof of the power of such a network. I recently opined that Republicans need to “make noise,” and in order to do so they need to build their own grassroots network not unlike Obama’s — one that they can call upon to take action, help elect candidates, and win crucial legislative battles both at the federal and statewide level. Although there have been some promising signs, such as Fred Thompson’s use of his network to , there remains no network that has the numbers, participation, and broad-spectrum membership as the one Obama built during his campaign.
Grade: D-
Fully using peer production in all aspects of the operations of the RNC and other Republican Organizations.
The big story of the Obama campaign wasn’t his network or his use of technology — although both were unparalleled and impeccable. Instead, it was the fact that this network peer produced 200,000 offline events, 400,000 blog posts, 3 million phone calls, and $500 million. This model is crucial to winning in this new “Age of Participation.” The RNC showed interest in taking advantage of this model with its Tech Summit, which was true peer production and suggests that newly-elected RNC Chair Steele may indeed wish to embrace this new model. However, without the aforementioned network, it will be very hard to use peer production to make substantial strides in the crucial areas of fundraising and voter outreach. Peer production also must have a role in policy decisions, which has certainly not been the case so far.
Grade: C-
Win over a large percentage of new young voters to turn the tide on a youth voting bloc that is increasingly voting Democrat.
This important tenet is the heart and soul of the NextGenGOP blog. One of the most exciting parts of CPAC for me was seeing many young conservatives that were willing to fight to get back on the right track. At the same time, however, these young conservatives are likely the same ones that turned out and voted for John McCain and Republicans in 2008. Unfortunately, these young voters constituted a of the total youth vote, and so the bottom line is that Republicans must strive to win the votes of new young voters — in other words, young voters who are not currently voting Republican. I previously expressed cautious optimism with regard to Chairman Steele’s new leadership because of the lack of serious efforts to focus on young voters, and just over a month later there still do not seem to be any major efforts from the RNC to accomplish this. This is quite worrisome, and and even more disconcerting is a that suggests the following:
By a 59 to 14 percent margin, young people prefer the Democrats when it comes to “paying attention to issues that affect younger people,” a six point gain since 2007.
This is entirely unacceptable, and something must be done to turn the tide before it’s too late. These young voters will soon no longer be young voters but middle-age voters, and Republicans can ill-afford to have a generation of voters that turns out to vote 4 to 1 in favor of Democrats.
Grade: F
Destroying the “Old Southern White Male” image.
This damaging image has indisputably hurt the Republican Party in elections; the good news is that the Republican National Committee’s new chairman only fulfills one of the words in the stereotype (male). Unfortunately, the other guy that for better or worse has recently been synonymized with the Republican Party — Rush Limbaugh — meets all of the above criteria, and like him or hate him, he does little to help make forward progress. Sarah Palin is one of the prominent female leaders in the GOP, but her tarnished image from the 2008 cycle diminishes her appeal to many non-conservatives. Fortunately, a few other new faces have arisen in the party that also help dispel this notion, including Representatives Cao and Schock.
Grade: B-
Building new, state-of-the art technology that gives Republicans a competitive advantage over Democrats.
Many independent efforts have taken place to improve the GOP’s technology and tools, and the RNC’s Tech Summit suggested a commitment to building state-of-the-art technology by Chairman Steele. However, the RNC’s RFP (Request for Proposal) was by many on both the right and left for being both “ludicrously ambitious” and “maddeningly vague.” Beyond the initial talking stage, however, little seems to have taken place thus far in terms of using or building new technology at the RNC, and so there is still much to be seen as to the success or failure of the RNC in advancing its technology.
Grade: C-
These are but a few areas in which the GOP must catch up in order to effectively compete once again at a national level. But just from taking a look at this list, it is clear that Republicans still have a great deal of work to do if they want to compete and ultimately achieve electoral victory in 2008.
Last 5 posts by Aaron Marks
- Onward and Upward: Building a Sustainable Majority - January 22nd, 2010
- Dear Young Voters: This Is What You Get When You Don't Vote - December 1st, 2009
- The Youth Vote and the 2009 Elections - November 6th, 2009
- The Best of the Post-2009 Election Spin - November 5th, 2009
- Introducing NextGenGOP Executive Director James Kane - October 20th, 2009

How far have the Democrats have sunk? Remember McGovernment & Democrats for Nixon?
or
In the midst of New England, it is not popular to even mention that you are a Republican on the streets. I grew up in New Hampshire during a more conservative time, and now the whole of New England has gone liberal. From my own perspective, I feel pretty abandoned. I was more a Mitt Romney fan than part of the McCain camp, and was surprised when he was nominated. When the Republicans lost the white house and so many seats in Congress, and now we basically have Obama in a monarchical position (look at all he’s accomplished to increase govt and spend our future away in endless stimulus packages/budget), I am about frothing at how there is no check to keep balance. The Republican minority is seen as childish in their opposition, and barely makes a peep. Is everyone afraid? Or is no one paying attention to the Republicans? Maybe being in MA has made my view darken, but where is the young conservative leadership? I see some on this blog, but where are they in the visible life of the National Party! From my perspective, I give the Republican party (my party) an F through D on all accounts at best. In the Northeast conservative politics have failed for the time being. Big government socialism in Mass is rampant, and the government is always looking for more money rather than slashing unnecessary services. Police and teachers are always the first to get pink slips because the budget managers know that the people will always ask for those positions back. It’s a mess up here, and it seems like we’ve been abandoned to live under the celebrity of Deval Patrick and Kennedy and Kerry.
Around these parts, mentioning former President Bush is shameful even if you can make a case for any good he may have done.
I’ve actually been tempted to start a third party ideology just so that the stigma of Bush wouldn’t hinder the good that conservative people could be doing here in New England. Some may say that it could not be so dire, and even some living here may say the same thing, but from my perspective, the situation for now is lost.
I don’t think the GOP is that bad shape as Dan G thinks. McCain in all his weaknesses was leading before he blundered. Now Obama has the presidency and he shows himself to be a weak ideologue. I feel sorry for Dan G living in the “Land of Lenin” The Red States are growing faster in population. The Republicans need to stay together and oppose Obama, Pelosi et al at every turn. Yes! I thought all along that Mitt R. would have been a better candidate.
You don’t oppose opponents just because they wear a different logo. You oppose them based on principle, which is based on intellectual discourse and reasoning. Republicans are lacking the discourse to play in the democratic lead environment on Capitol Hill because for the most part they lack principle(obviously this does not apply to all Republicans on Capitol Hill, and those are the ones we love). But right now they just do not have the intellect and courage to damage the credibility the Dems have with the majority of the public. Eventually the democrats will damage their own credibility all by themselves, and it won’t take long, as we are seeing it right now. The Republicans did this under the second half of Bush’s first term, and under the first half of his second term, which led to major defeats in the House and Senate.
Did anyone see the young conservative gentleman from the British Parliment excoriate Prime Minister Brown the other day? He was able to effectively, courageously, and intellectually put forth his COMMOM SENSE views in a manner that would easily be comprehensible to the public, although he knows economics very well, to the point where he was able to be as effective as he was. The Republicans have none of that right now. Zero leadership. Until a Statesman, or leader, is established who is not afraid to take on the status quo, the statists, then the Republican party will be rather ineffective in reducing what credibility the Dems currently maintain with the public.
If I were to grade the Republicans right now I would give them an F. The current policy proposals and laws being passed by the Dems give the GOP an incredible amount of ammunition in order to build support, but they don’t take advantage of it, for reasons I listed above.
Great web site! And great question to knock around. Bobby Jindal is an awesome and unashamed voice for conservative values and federalism!
See the Rasmussen polls and others, however, to round out your Gov Palin data. For some reason, independents love Sarah Palin. Somehow independents are not trusting the media’s presentation of Crazy Palin and are relating to her just fine. Imo that present reality/trend will only increase in coming years. Even if she doesn’t run in ’12, I expect her to be a powerhouse campaigner for GOP candidates in ’10 and ’12.