The image of Barack Obama as forever present in contemporary political life is speedily being replaced with a more accurate picture of operating under the the same rules as generations of earlier pols hailing from the windy city. Chicago has its well-known moniker not because of the winds blowing across the relatively flat American Midwest, but due historically to the caliber and sincerity of its ruling elite. Not , or even , but separate people Barack Obama desired to have in his administration have all since been clouded in tax controversies; of the three, only Tim Geithner, arguably the worst offender, is now expected to serve in the Obama administration. Meanwhile, a stimulus package moves that looks to while lending validation to the pet projects of from coast to coast.
President to apologize for his recent nominations. One presumes, however, that the President is not sorry for trying to put tax cheaters in positions of power, but merely for being caught having attempted to do so. The withdrawals of two of Obama’s planned “czars” from intended service only reduces the of , honest or not, in what is expected to be an ambitious administration. Though the thought of people with less than stellar records of paying taxes being put in charge of such thorough tasks such as overseeing , streamlining legislation to rid policy initiatives of wasteful spending, and is troubling, even more disturbing is President Obama’s with regard to the U.S. Constitution and national security concerns.
The first two weeks of the Obama administration have surely been discouraging for the millions of Americans who took to his vague, but assuring message of “” when voting last year. Arrogance was one of the of the Bush administration. Now, it seems, some things never change.
Last 5 posts by James Kane
- A November to Remember - November 8th, 2010
- On hope and fear - October 18th, 2010
- Expecting Different Results - September 12th, 2010
- A glaring omission on Iraq - August 31st, 2010
- Employing a losing strategy - August 7th, 2010

You asked me on twitter to comment as to what I think they should do to vet people: I’m not really sure.
There is no real “test” in order to hold public office in our constitution, and that’s a good thing – sort of.
I do not think our Founders foresaw career politicians like obama, blago, et al.
I guess at the very least they should have their taxes looked at, drug history, credit, etc…..