Confirmation hearings are already underway for Obama’s cabinet and other nominees. Presently, Senator Clinton has been the focus of Senate proceedings. Obama is seeking to appoint New York senator and former first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton Secretary of State. Despite thus far from the U.S. Senate, cloud her potential conduct in such a role.
Former President Clinton’s library and foundation benefited from foreign contributions, and have been a point of concern. In discussing , the junior senator from New York expressed concerns about the standing of the United States in the world, vowing to .
Senator Clinton is right to say that the , but the concerns over Clinton’s conduct on behalf of her husband’s interests are a legitimate matter, particularly considering to the former President’s pet causes. American foreign policy will be hindered and not helped if the appearance of impropriety is present in the conduct of the chief U.S. foreign policy officer, the Secretary of State.
The Senator Clinton has received in the confirmation hearings should not result in a vote to make her Secretary of State until she has made assurances regarding her husband’s business interests. Incidentally, Mrs. Clinton is not the only . Republicans should be willing to work with the President elect, , and are right to invite him to , but his nominees for important governmental appointments should be scrutinized, if the President-elect really does seek to represent a break with past administrations.
Last 5 posts by James Kane
- A November to Remember - November 8th, 2010
- On hope and fear - October 18th, 2010
- Expecting Different Results - September 12th, 2010
- A glaring omission on Iraq - August 31st, 2010
- Employing a losing strategy - August 7th, 2010

There are no clean Democrats who have any experience…not trying to be inflammatory, just being honest.
I’d disagree, David. Corruption and cheating may be common in politics, but they are not universal traits in either party.
At least Tim Geithner’s confirmation has been “delayed” although I don’t quite understand why, they are just going to blow it off anyway and pretend as though it’s no big deal that the future head of the IRS conveniently forgot to pay his taxes.
James up there is exactly right, you have corruption on either side of the party line, however this absolutely sends the wrong message.
I am more concerned with the ethical question of the head of the IRS not paying his taxes than any crap Hillary ever did or didn’t do.
“Same you can believe in!”