A glaring omission on Iraq

President Obama delivered an address Tuesday night to mark the end of U.S. combat operations in Iraq. While the speech featured no surprises, it is memorable both for its tone and for what was not said. The change of status in Iraq, however, may not be a harbinger for course correction in the United States.

Every elected President of the United States since Wilson has left office, whether through retirement or death, physically much older than at inauguration. Administrations of both parties have made tough decisions on when and how to employ military force abroad. Historians will long debate the merits of decisions made by various commanders-in-chief. The most complicated of these decisions, however, occur when one administration inherits a conflict from another.

Continue reading →

Employing a losing strategy

Despite some probable Republican gains this year, Democrats have a good chance of retaining control of Congress next year. Fortunately for Republicans, Democrats nationally have opted for a losing strategy; blaming George W. Bush. Then again, with a track record like that of this Congress, one cannot fault Democratic strategists for trying to distract the electorate this year.

Continue reading →

In Defense of Michael Steele

It has been said that there are two parties in the United States; a stupid party and an evil party. Perhaps better described as a naive party and an opportunist party, the idea behind this concept is that the the poor decisions of one party allow for enactment of the unfathomable agenda of the other. It is clear this week that the GOP is, at the moment, the Stupid Party. Continue reading →

McDonald and Kagan

While the Senate Judiciary Committee asked questions this week of Solicitor General Elena Kagan, President Obama’s choice to replace retiring Justice John Paul Stevens, the Supreme Court announced a ruling on an issue Democrats would prefer to avoid; the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. In McDonald v. Chicago, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution applies to the states, thereby undermining state and city gun prohibitions nationwide. Initial press accounts have suggested that this decision could render gun control a non-issue in electoral politics. History, however, suggests otherwise. Continue reading →

The Petraeus Dilemma.

The resignation of four-star General Stanley McChrystal from command of U.S. forces in Afghanistan came Wednesday after fallout from an interview appearing in Rolling Stone. McChrystal, whose involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan has earned him praise in the past, used the magazine interview as an avenue to offer criticisms of the Obama administration. The White House was quick to push the ouster and propose a replacement and offer a replacement to command Allied forces in Afghanistan who will most likely have broad support in Congress.  By putting forward another four-star general, David H. Petraeus, as McChrystal’s replacement President Obama has created a rather interesting dilemma. Continue reading →

On Paul and Blumenthal

Two senate races continue to dominate the headlines nationwide. Kentucky was one of the states in which a primary was held on Tuesday. Connecticut features a senate race once competitive until the decision of Chris Dodd to retire at the end of his present term. Both U.S. Senate contests, however continue to generate much intrigue. Continue reading →

Lessons from Arizona

Dominating the headlines for the past few weeks across the United States has been a news item out of Arizona. Recently, Arizona lawmakers passed a tough measure into law meant to tackle illegal immigration. The contents of this law, and reactions to it, offer valuable lessons moving forward to anyone concerned with American politics and public policy. Continue reading →

Some Insight on Ideology

Ideology seems to be a topic of renewed interest in the United States at present. While ideologues on all sides have long reveled in their exagerated banter, it seems that the media is now involved. Nonetheless, the press too fails to capture the essential realities of contemporary American political life.

On the left and the right today, there are grandiose motivations offered as to the hidden ambitions or backgrounds of political opponents. Much as some Tea Partiers have accused the current administration of being socialist in outlook, commentators on the left have been throwing around the term fascist to criticize those opposing the policies of the Obama administration. The irony is that fascists would accuse their opponents of socialism, and socialists would accuse their staunchest critics of fascism. Commentators in the employ of  reputable newspapers ought to be smarter than to confuse the legitimate qualms many have with the current administration for the bellicose ideology that dominated Europe in the nineteen thirties. If recent polls are an indication, Tea Partiers too, as a whole, ought to know better than to deride their political opponents in some of the ways that they have. Continue reading →

Voter Fraud- There’s an App for That?

The future of political volunteerism launched on April 3, 2010.

I’ve held off jumping into the iPad fray for the most part, waiting until I can actually buy the 3G version outright before making my own conclusions. But there was always one thing I knew the iPad could truly revolutionize- and it’s already in development.

According to Tech President via TechRepublican-

Project Vote, which describes itself as a nonpartisan organization that promotes higher voter registration rates in low-income and minority communities, announced last week that they are working on a mobile-device-friendly voter registration application, according to a press release, that will work on anything from the BlackBerry to the magical iPad.

But a magic wand it ain’t: In the release, Project Vote admits that there are only four states (Arizona, Colorado, Oregon, and Washington) that allow electronic voter registration. …

Using a mobile voter registration application, a volunteer canvassing a neighborhood […] is supposed to be able to collect the information of a prospective voter right there on his iPad, then electronically transmit that information along to that state’s board of elections, or secretary of state, or whichever group is responsible for administering elections and voter registration.

Pretty impressive, no? This could truly revolutionize the way we think of political volunteerism. This has already been used in small part in several races recently- from the McDonnell to the Scott Brown race- I even was able to use a blackberry in a local special election.

However, while the Project Vote organization calls itself “a nonpartisan organization”, when you do more digging you find this little gem-

Working with our field partner, the community organization ACORN, Project Vote in 2007-2008 conducted the largest and most comprehensive voter registration drive in the history of our two organizations, a 21-state community-based operation that succeeded in collecting over 1.3 million voter registration applications.

That’s right- the same Acorn that was recently involved in the prostitution scandals, and more importantly, embroiled in the voter fraud scandals over the last few elections. Project Vote claimed responsibility for the surge in support for Obama campaign in the last election, and was also critical in the 1992 election, bringing in more than 150,000 new African American voters. While Politifact says that Project Vote is was directly an arm of ACORN in 1992, their relationship since then has been rather murky, with Project Vote defending accusations against ACORN as “absolutely false”- even as the FBI launched a probe into the allegations of fraud.

The simple truth is that it’s just a matter of time before we have an entirely paperless campaign experience. Volunteers might be able to download an application onto their own devices and head out to targeted areas near them via their GPS-enabled Google Maps service. From there, they can go door-to-door, armed with an entire visual interactive experience for constituents. Or perhaps they’ll collect names and signatures for ballot initiatives or primary ballots, showing a compelling video that leads directly into a signup form. All of this will come directly from a single paperless device that broadcasts the signature to the database instantaneously.

But what happens when this tool is first used by the same people who infamously enrolled the Dallas Cowboys to vote in Nevada? The potential for abuse is tremendous. This will be something Republicans need to watch carefully, as oversight on matters like this will be hard to scale. As a developer of iPhone applications, the potential excites me- I would love to have a client that would recognize the potential of such a service, but I am also concerned about the potential impact on elections when people attempt to use this for more nefarious purposes. We need to move political volunteerism into the future, but not at the cost of election fraud and manipulation.

On Seeking Civility

Something which ought to be a given in contemporary American political discourse is that violence, or the threat of violence, against those with whom one disagrees is unacceptable. Just as the free market is essential to the improvement of goods and services in commerce, a free market of ideas is crucial to the shaping of a free society. Ideas, like concepts in mathematics and the natural sciences, warrant continual testing as time pogresses and new circumstances emerge. Intellectual honesty must be an essential component to experimentation in all areas of rational discourse. Continue reading →